Understanding the Effects of High Intensity Treadmill Training on Corticomotor Excitability and Walking in Stroke Survivors
Stroke is a leading cause of adult disability, with gait deficits contributing significantly to functional limitations after stroke. One of the reasons for functional impairment after stroke is the decrease in neural drive, or the corticomotor excitability to the affected side of the lower limb muscles. The goal of this study was to understand the effects of a novel high intensity treadmill training (HITT) protocol on walking speeds and neural drive in individuals who had a stroke. Our sample consisted of three individuals who had a stroke and were able to walk for at least 10 minutes with- out assistance. This was a pilot study that was a part of a larger randomized controlled trial examining the effects of a noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on treadmill training. All subjects participated in 12 sessions of treadmill training (40 minutes per session, three days a week for four weeks). Overground walking speed was examined throughout the four weeks of training, and corticomotor excitability was examined at baseline and after completion of training. Corti- comotor excitability was measured using non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the lower limb motor cortex. At the end of four weeks post training, we noticed a decrease in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via TMS in the paretic tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. In addition, we noticed improvements in treadmill training speeds and overground walking speeds. This paradox may indicate a number of things—spinal cord excitability may be elicited more than the motor cortex (Martinez, Delivet-Mongrain, & Rossignol, 2012), or endurance training may be playing a role in excitability because of practice effects (Kumpulainen et al., 2014). This preliminary data brings questions that arise from the paradoxical phenomenon that HITT has on the neural drive and gait speed in stroke survivors. These results are promising and form the basis of investigating the effects of walking training on neural plasticity.
Badawy, R., Loetscher, T., Macdonell, R., & Brodtmann, A. (2012). Cortical excitability and neurology: insights into pathophysiology. Functional Neurology, 27(3), 131-145.
Bestmann, S. (2007). The physiological basis of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 81-83.
Bogey, R. & Hornby, G. (2007). Gait training strategies utilized in poststroke rehabilitation: are we really making a difference? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14, 1-8.
Boyne, P., Dunning, K., Carl, D., Gerson, M., Khoury, J., Kissela, B. (2013). High-intensity interval training in stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 20(4), 317-330.
Dobkin, B., Firestone, A., & West, M. (2004). Ankle dor- siflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation. Neuroimage, 23, 370-381.
Floyer-Lea, A. & Matthews, P. (2004). Changing brain networks for visuomotor control with increased movement automaticity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 2405-2412.
Globas, C., Becker, C., Cerny, J., Lam, J, Lindemann, U., Forrester, L., & Luft, A. (2012). Chronic stroke survivors benefit from high-intensity aerobic treadmill exercise: A ran- domized control trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(1), 85-95.
Hallet, M., (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A primer. Neuron Primer, 55, 187-199.
Jorgensen, J., Bech-Pedersen, D., Zeeman, P., Sorensen, J., Andersen, L., Schonberger, M. (2010). Effect of intensive outpatient physical training on gait performance and car- diovascular health in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, 90(4), 527-537.
Kumpulainen, S., Avela, J., Gruber, M., Bergmann, J., Voigt, M., Linnamo, V., & Mrachacz-Kersting, N. (2014). Differ- ential modulation of motor cortex plasticity in skill- and endurance-trained athletes. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 1-9.
Lam, J., Globas, C., Cerny, B., Uludag, K., Forrester, L., Macko, R., Hanley, D., Becker, C., & Luft, A. (2010). Pre- dictors of response to treadmill exercise in stroke survivors. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24(6), 567-574.
Madhavan, S. & Shah, B. (2012). Enhancing motor skill learning with transcranial direct current stimulation—a concise review with applications to stroke. Frontiers in Psy- chiatry, 66, 1-9.
Martinez, M., Delivet-Mongrain, D., & Rossignol, S. (2012). Treadmill training promotes spinal changes leading to locomotor recovery after partial spinal cord injury in cats. Journal of Neurophysiology, 109, 2909-2922.
Rogers, L., Madhavan, S., Roth, H., & Stinear, J. (2011). Transforming neurorehabilitation of walking following stroke: The promise of non-invasive brain stimulation—a review. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 29, 507-516.
Thomas, S., & Gorassini, M. (2005). Increases in cortico- spinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 2844-2855.
Tyrell, C., Roos, M., Rudolph, K., & Reisman, D. (2011). In- fluence of systematic increases in treadmill walking speed on gait kinematics after stroke. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, 91(3), 392-403.
Wing, K., Lynskey, J., & Bosch, P. (2012). Walking speed in stroke survivors: consideration for clinical practice. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 28(2), 113-121.
Yen, C., Wang, R., Liao, K., Huang, C., & Yang, Y. (2008). Gait training—induced change in corticomotor excitability in patients with chronic stroke. The Neuroscientist, 22, 22-30.