AbstractWe present results from a collaborative pilot project designed to assess the accuracy of Internet panel surveys for behavioral health surveillance. Data were collected using three sampling methods that differ with respect to recruitment strategy, sample selection and sample matching to the US adult population in four states and Metropolitan Statistical Areas. We present comparative analyses that assess the advantages and disadvantages of these methods with respect to cost, geography, timeliness, usability, and ease of use for technology transfer to states and local communities. Recommendations for future efforts in behavioral health surveillance are given based on these results.
Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author and OJPHI are acknowledged in the copy and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes. Share-alike: when posting copies or adaptations of the work, release the work under the same license as the original. For any other use of articles, please contact the copyright owner. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work, including uses infringing the above license. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.