AbstractThe variations across the country in the methodological reporting of Atrial Septal Defect (ASD), one type of birth defect, would suggest misleading gaps in reported prevalence rates. Using the data in 2012, we executed Poisson regression analysis to examine the association of prevalence rates of ASD with coding systems adjusting for the potential confounding factors. We found a two-fold higher prevalence rate of ASD for states using ICD-9-CM without exclusion PFO, compared to those using the coding system of the CDC or ICD-9-CM with exclusion PFO for case definition. Furthermore, an interaction term between coding system and case ascertainment methods were also observed. The study revealed that coding systems and case ascertainment methods may lead highly varied prevalence rates of ASD across States A standardized criteria to bridge this variability will play an important role in public health polices and prevention programs.
Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author and OJPHI are acknowledged in the copy and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes. Share-alike: when posting copies or adaptations of the work, release the work under the same license as the original. For any other use of articles, please contact the copyright owner. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work, including uses infringing the above license. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.